@article{Tart_2012, title={Comments on Crabtree’s "Hypnosis Reconsidered, Resituated, and Redefined"}, volume={26}, url={https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/408}, abstractNote={I was very stimulated by Adam Crabtree&rsquo;s article, and also a little embarrassed. I am always preaching to colleagues that you should be sensitive to the implicit and cultural assumptions you make, so how in the world could I have been so blithely ignorant of the cultural assumptions built into the process of defining hypnosis by biased lists of phenomena? I began reading extensively in the hypnosis literature as a young man, and by the time I was in my second year of college was quite well-informed about what was known at that time. I had seen many lists of hypnotic phenomena, and while intellectually I questioned the idea of &ldquo;Authorities&rdquo; in general&mdash;what young person doesn&rsquo;t?&mdash;at that age I was still pretty accepting that the Authorities1 on hypnosis knew what they were talking about. I was aware that modern writers on hypnosis prejudicially left out any mention of the apparent parapsychological aspects of hypnosis, but I assumed they were otherwise accurate.<br /><br /&gt;}, number={2}, journal={Journal of Scientific Exploration}, author={Tart, Charles}, year={2012}, month={Jun.} }